The Quest Continues

Comparing Seven Money Flow Indicators

by Markos Katsanos

An overabundance of money flow indicators can clutter your desktop and could confuse you with contradicting signals. But do these indicators have any predictive value? If so, which is best?

Since Joseph Granville presented the first money flow indicator in 1963, other technicians have attempted to improve on Granville’s original formula or devise a completely new approach using volume to predict market price moves. On-balance volume (Obv), Chaikin money flow (Cmf), accumulation/distribution, volume price trend (Vpt), volume oscillator (VO), ease of movement, negative volume index, positive volume index, Klinger oscillator, volume flow indicator (Vfi), and the money flow index (Mfi) are all indicators that technicians have developed to quantify the relationship between price and volume.

Yes, there are many. Bearing in mind that besides the stock chart and other price-based indicators there is only room on a 19-inch monitor for one or two volume indicators, you will have to choose from more than 15 money flow indicators for your standard layouts. An even more critical decision would be choosing a volume indicator for your trading system, given that two different indicators can produce contradicting signals.

Which ones work the best? To find out, I tested seven popular money flow indicators using two objective mechanical systems and a visual method. But first, here’s some background information on these indicators.

The basics
Volume or money flow indicators can be divided into five categories:

Image 1

Figure 1: Combined total profits of both systems on a stock-by-stock basis for the divergence (fourth column) and the direction test (fifth column). The stocks are sorted by capitalization and colored according to profitability. The best performers were small- and mid-cap stocks and the worst performers were the financials.

…Continued in the July issue of Technical Analysis of Stocks & Commodities

Return to Contents